A Work in Progress

Supplementary Files

title authors page

How to Cite

Hartnett, M., McCoy, A., Weed, R., & Nickens, N. (2014). A Work in Progress. Educational Renaissance, 3(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.33499/edren.v3i1.81


Colleagues at a midwestern university implemented a multi-semester co-teaching pilot for student teaching, and based on the data collected, are moving toward full implementation in the spring of 2015 for all pre-service teachers in the College of Education (COE). Part of the study replicated work conducted by St. Cloud University (Bacharach & Heck, 2011) and utilized that university’s evaluation instruments. However, the lessons learned in the pilot reveal some of the still “unanswered” questions as to how to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the co-teaching model during student teaching. Researchers share results and insights, and suggest action steps for full implementation of the co-teaching model.




Bacharach, N, & Heck, T. (2011). Mentoring teacher candidates through co-teaching: Train-the-Trainer workshop handbook. St. Cloud, MN: St. Cloud State University, Teacher Quality Enhancement Center.

Bacharach, N., Heck, T., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Changing the face of student teaching through

co-teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1) 1-13.

Bacharach, N., Heck, T. & Dank, M. (February, 2004). Co-teaching in Student Teaching: A case

study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Dallas, Texas.

Chan, W. Y., Lau, S., Nie, Y., Lim, S., & Hogan, D. (2008). Organizational and personal

predictors of teacher commitment: The mediating role of teacher efficacy and identification with school. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 597-630.

Cook, L. & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus

on Exceptional Children 26(3), 1-16.

Ebmeier, H., (2003). How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(2), 110-141.

Eick, C., Ware, F., & Williams, P. (2003). Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (1), 74-85).

Friend, M. (2000). Myths and misunderstandings about professional collaboration. Remedial

& Special Education, 21(3), 130-132.

Friend, M. & Cook, L. (2006). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (5th

Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Heck, T. & Bacharach, N. (2010). Mentoring teacher

candidates through co-teaching:

Collaboration that makes a difference. St. Cloud, MN: St. Cloud State University.

Murawski, W. (2010). Collaborative teaching in elementary schools: Making the co-teaching

marriage work! Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Murawski W. & Diker, L. (2004). Tips and strategies for co-teaching at the secondary level.

Teaching Exceptional Children 36(5), 52-58.

Perl, M., Maughmer, B., & McQueen, C. (1999). Co-teaching: A different approach for

cooperating teaches & student teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the

Association of Teacher Educators, Chicago.

Villa, R., Thousand, J., & Nevin, A. (2008). A guide to co-teaching: Practical tips for

facilitating student learning (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).