With national and state regulatory changes related to clinical practice within teacher education programs a reality, one university examined the outcomes of co-teaching model trainings required for stakeholders, both higher education faculty and P-12 educators. The training participants indicated the co-teaching model could increase student teacher preparedness while also positively impacting P-12 student learning. Nearly a year after the co-teaching training, one university surveyed student teachers on their co-teaching experience prior to and during student teaching. While there were increase mean scores of all the co-teaching models, results pointed to questions of whether teacher candidates were engaged in lower-level impact co-teaching models, which involved teacher candidates observing and assisting.
Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 245-255.
Bacharach, N., Heck, T., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Changing the face of student teaching through co-teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1), 3-14.
Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States and the National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
Dieker, L., & Mujrawski, W. (2003). Co-teaching at the secondary level: Unique issues, current trends, and suggestions. The High School Journal, 86(4), 1-13.
Eick, C. J., Ware, F. N., & Williams, P. G. (2003). Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 74-85.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. New York: Routledge.
KAR 5:040 Admission, placement, and supervision in student teaching.
Governor’s Task Force on Transforming Education in Kentucky. (2011). Breaking new Ground: Final report of the Governor’s Task Force on Transforming Education in Kentucky (TEK). Frankfort, KY: Author.
Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board. (2011). 16 KAR 5:040. Section 6.(5)(e) 1.). Frankfort, KY: Author.
Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. (2005). Co-teaching in middle school classrooms under routine conditions: Does the instructional experience differ for students with disabilities in co-taught and solo-taught classes? Learning Disabilities Research, 20(2), 79-85.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Graetz, J., Norland, J., Gardizi, W., & McDuffie, K. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 260-270.
Murawski, W., & Swanson, H. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 258-267.
National Council of Accreditation of Colleges. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Washington DC: Author.
Roth, W., & Tobin, K. (2004). Co-teaching: From praxis to theory. Teachers and Teaching, 10(2), 161-179.
School of Teacher Education. (2013). WKU Co-Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.wku.edu/ste/co-teaching/
United States Department of Education. (2009). The American recovery and reinvestment Act of 2009: Saving and creating jobs and reforming education. Washington DC: Author.
United States Department of Education. (2001). Public law 107–110. Washington DC: Author.
Wiseman, D. (2012). The intersection of policy, reform, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 87-91.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).