Motivations for Learning

How to Cite

McKenna, C. (2014). Motivations for Learning. Educational Renaissance, 3(1), 21-32.


The purpose of this multi-case study was to discover the causes of low self-efficacy for math for a group of historically low-performing 7th grade students at a high-poverty urban middle school. Bandura’s (1986) Social Cognitive Theory, specifically the concept of self-efficacy. Qualitative methods were used to collect data, including structured one-on-one interviews and classroom observations. In addition, a student survey provided data on student self-efficacy and offered further insight into individual student perceptions. The cross-case analysis surfaced evidence for each of the four sources of self-efficacy. The findings of this study can provide educators with insights into the causes of low self-efficacy for students at the middle grade level and allow researchers to theorize about a broader set of cases related to learning math.


Anderman, E.M., & Maehr, M.L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), p. 287-309.

Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2006). Closing the mathematics achievement gap in high poverty middle schools: Enablers and constraints. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11(2), 143–159.

Balfanz, R., & Legters, N. (2006). The graduation rate crisis we know and what can be done about it. Education Week. Retrieved from

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

Campillo, M., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hudesman, J. (1999, August). Enhancing academic study skill, self-efficacy, and achievement through self-regulatory training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

Chen, P. (2003). Exploring the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh-grade mathematics students. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 79-92.

Chen, P., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). A cross-national comparison study on the accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs of middle school mathematics students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 221-244.

Downey, J.A. (2008). Recommendations for fostering educational resilience in the classroom. Preventing School Failure, 53(1), 56-64.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.

McNeil, N.M., Grandau, L., Knuth, E.J., Alibali, M.W., Stephens, A.C., Hattikudur, S., & Krill, D.E. (2006). Middle-school students’ understanding of the equal sign: The books they read can’t help. Cognition and Instruction, 24(3), 367-385.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2011a). The nation’s report card: Mathematics 2011 (NCES 2012-458). Institute for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2011b). The nation’s report card: Trial urban district assessment mathematics 2011 (NCES-452). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.

National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, Va. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.

Niehaus, K., Rudasill, K.M., & Adelson, J.L. (2012). Self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation and academic outcomes among Latino middle school students participating in an after-school program. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 34(1), 118-136.

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.

Provasnik, S., Gonzales, P., & Miller, D. (2009). U.S. performance across international assessments of student achievement: Special supplement to The Condition of Education 2009 (NCES 2009-083). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.

Rowan, A.H., Hall, D., & Haycock, K. (2010). Gauging the gaps: A deeper look at student achievement. The Education Trust. Washington, DC.

Snowman, J., McCown, R., Biehler, R. (2012). Psychology applied to teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadworth.

Stake, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 435-454.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Usher, E.L. (2009). Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in math: A qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 275-314.

Usher, E.L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751-796.

Usher, E.L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 89-101.

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3- 14.

Williams, T., & Williams, K. (2010). Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 453-466.

Ysseldyke,J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., Teelucksingh, E., Boyes, C., & Lemkuil, A. (2003). Using a curriculum-based instructional management system to enhance math achievement in urban schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 8(2), 247-265.

Yin, R.K. (2005). Introducing the world of education: A case study reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.

Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).