The goal of this study is to determine how effectively student teachers from a large comprehensive institution have used technology to compliment their teaching in mathematics and science. The researchers reviewed the required Teacher Work Sample (TWS) capstone projects of student teachers. The TWS is an authentic assessment instrument designed to guide student teachers in designing, implementing, reviewing, and adjusting instruction. The TWS document narratives articulated the use of technology, and this use was compared to the 2008 U.S. Department of Education (USDE): Measures of Teacher and Student Technology Use. Data gathered in the study revealed both strengths and weaknesses regarding the student teachers’ use of technology to enhance their teaching goals.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2008). Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Teacher Preparation Institutions. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education: Washington, D.C.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). The National Educational Technology Standards for students. International Society for Technology in Education: Eugene, OR.
Kentucky Department of Education. (2008). Kentucky teaching standards. Retrieved on July 1, 2009, from http://www.kyepsb.net/teacherprep/standards.asp.
U.S. Department of Education. (2008). National educational technology trends study: Local-level data summary. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service: Washington, D.C.
Vanetta, R. & Beyerbach, B. (2000). Facilitating a constructivist vision of technology integration among education faculty and preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 133-48.
Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education program for initial licensure (NCES 2008-040). National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education: Washington, D.C.
Beckett, E., Wetzel, K., Buss, R., Chisholm, I., Misdoubted, E., & Padgett, H. (2001). Preservice and in-service teachers collaborate to integrate technology into K-8 classrooms. SITE Conference: Norfolk, VA.
Duhaney, D.C. (2001). Teacher education: Preparing teachers to integrate technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(1), 23-30.
The Renaissance Partnership for Improving Teacher Quality (2001). Teacher work sample: Performance prompt, teaching process standards, scoring rubrics. Retrieved on July 1, 2009 from http://fp.uni.due/itq/ProjectActivities/index.htm
Pankratz, R. (1999). Improving teacher quality through partnerships that connect teacher performance to student learning. Unpublished manuscript, Western Kentucky University.
Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M., & Girod, G. (1997). Teacher work sample methodology as used at Western Oregon State College. In J. McMillan (Ed.) Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 15-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Denner, P., Norman, A.D., Salzman, S., Pankratz, R., & Evans, S. (2004). The Renaissance Partnership teacher work sample: Evidence supporting score generalizability, validity, and quality of student learning assessment. ATE Yearbook XII, 23-56.
Teacher Work Sample #4600. (2006). College of education and behavioral sciences professional education unit accountability system.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).