Perceptions and Understandings of Low Literacy Among Developing Teacher Candidates

How to Cite

Baugher, J., & Singleton, E. (2021). Perceptions and Understandings of Low Literacy Among Developing Teacher Candidates. Educational Renaissance, 10(1), 14-21.


While little is known of the perceptions held by members of the general public toward persons of low literacy background, this research study worked to inform a subset of those perceptions as held by developing teacher candidates.  Additionally, this study sought to more concretely frame contributing and non-contributing factors which this same population believed influenced occurrences of low literacy.  Anchored in the concept of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1989), this study collected and analyzed 56 survey responses which yielded informative themes that further defined low literacy as an obstacle, outcome, level of performance, or degree of achievement. 

Teacher candidates further demonstrated an understanding that conditions of low literacy were often situationally-defined as those persons were commonly disadvantaged in some way.  Candidates’ responses further purported their action plan in confronting low literacy in their classroom was founded upon these verbs: act, invest, connect, and equalize.  Though this study alone is not comprehensive or absolute in its findings, it does help to inform a step of the journey that will lead to a more accurate understanding of the perceptions held of low literacy and its many, influential tentacles.


Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halforn, N. (2014). Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience. Health Affairs, 33(12), 2106-2115.

Blodgett, C. (2015). No school alone: How community risks and assets contribute to school and youth success. Washington State Office of Financial Management. Brochin, C. (2018). Assembled identities and intersectional advocacy in literacy research. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 67(1), 164-179.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press. Development Services Group, Inc. (2015c). Protective factors against delinquency. Literature review. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. mpg/litreviews/Protective%20Factors.pdf

Cherry, K. (2020). How person perceptions helps us form impressions of others. https://www.verywell

Cook, J.M., & Newman, E. (2014). A consensus statement on trauma mental health: The New Haven Competency Conference process and major findings. Psychological Trauma: Theory Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(4), 300.

Compton-Lilly, C., Papoi, K., Venegas, P., Hamman, L., & Schwabenbauer, B. (2017). Intersectional identity negotiation: The case of young immigrant children. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(1), 115–140.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage

Fink, A. (2013). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (5th ed.). Sage. Flynn, S., Brown, J., Johnson, A., & Rodger, S. (2011). Barriers to education for the marginalized adult learner. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 43-58. Fry, R. (2017). 5 Facts About Millenial Households. 09/06/5-facts-about-millennial-households/

Grant, K., & Zwier, E. (2017). Intersectionality and Education. http://www.oxfordbibliographies. com/view/document/obo-9780199756810/obo -9780199756810-0188.xml

Harlow, C. W. (2003). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: Education and Correctional Populations. pdf/ecp.pdf Jaggi, S. (2019). The many forms of homelessness. homelessness/

Johnson, A. G. (2006). Privilege, power, and difference (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. Levi, D. J. (2013). Group dynamics for teams (4th ed.). Sage.

Mangro, K. (2008). Exploring the experiences and challenges of adults from war-affected backgrounds: New directions for literacy educators. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 2(1), 24-33.

Martinez, R. & Fernandez, A. (2010). The Social and economic impact of illiteracy: Analytical model and pilot study. /ark:/48223/pf0000190571 Melia, E. (2008). Can read, can write. Adults Learning, 20(1), 28-29.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

McCombes, S. (2020). How to do a case study. study/ Nichols-Frazer, E. (2019). How writing (and Reading) can help heal trauma. -writing-and-reading-can-help-heal-trauma/ ProLiteracy. (2020). U.S. adult literacy facts. AdultLitFacts_US_flyer.pdf

Roman, S. P. (2004). Illiteracy and older adults: Individual and societal implications. Educational Gerontology, 30(2), 79-93.

Tyner, A. R. (2014). The emergence of the school-to-prison pipeline. https://www.american ereport/2014/june_2014/the_emergence_of_the _school-to-prison_pipeline/

Voices of Youth Count. (2017). Missed opportunities: Youth homelessness in America. uploads/2017/11/ChapinHall_VoYC_1-Pager_ Final_111517.pdf

White-Cummings, C. (2016). Reading, writing, and traumatic stress: Helping kids cope during the school year. /9/27/reading-writing-and-traumatic-stress -helping-kids-cope-during-the-school-year

Zoukis, C. (2017). Basic literacy a crucial took to stem School To Prison Pipeline. a-crucial-tool-to-stem-school-to-prison

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).