A Co-Requisite Model for Developmental Mathematics

How to Cite

Atkins, C., & McCoy, A. (2017). A Co-Requisite Model for Developmental Mathematics. Educational Renaissance, 5(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.33499/edren.v5i1.101


The traditional mathematics pre-requisite model creates obstacles for pre-service educators by increasing the number of semesters to graduation.  Extended time results in additional financial burdens for students in developmental courses along with increased risk of student drop out.  Education majors, with little or no room for electives in their programs of study, have been particularly impacted. The pilot of a co-requisite model, involving the collaboration of two academic departments, has proven successful in enhancing students’ academic achievement while addressing social and emotional needs of students.




Arendale, D. R. (2011). Then and now: The early years of developmental education.Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 27(2), 58-76.

Aslan, D. (2013). A comparison of pre- and in-service preschool teachers’ mathematical anxiety and beliefs about mathematics for young children. Academic Research International, 4(2), 225-230.

Bekdemir, M. (2010). The pre-service teachers’ mathematics anxiety related to depth of negative experiences in mathematics classroom while they were students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 311-328.

Bitner, J., Austin, S., & Wadlington, E. (1994). A comparison of math anxiety in traditional and nontraditional developmental college students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 10(2), 35-43.

Boylan, H. R. (2009). Targeted intervention for developmental education students (T. I. D. E. S.). Journal of Developmental Education, 32(3), 14-23.

Castator, M. M. (1995). Identifying high-risk courses for underprepared students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.

Clough, S., Montgomery, S. (2015). How ACT assessments align with state college and career readiness standards. Retrieved from ACT: http://www.discoveract aspire.org/pdf/ACT_Alignment-Whte-Paper.pdf

Cooper, K. J. (2014). Remedial rescue: New approaches to developmental education have proved successful for several two-year colleges. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 31(18), 14-15.

Core principles for transforming remediation within a comprehensive student success strategy: A joint statement. (2015). Retrieved from http://completecollege.org /wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Core-Principles-2015.pdf

Gresham, G. (2007). A study of mathematics anxiety in pre-service teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), 181-188.

Lambdin, D. V., & Walcott, C. (2007). Changes through the years: Connections between psychological learning theories and the school mathematics curriculum. In W. G. Martin, M. E. Strutchens, & P. C. Elliott (Eds.), The learning of Mathematics: Sixty-ninth yearbook (pp. 3-25). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Saxon, D. P., & Boylan, H. R. (2001). The cost of remedial education in higher education. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(2), 2-8.

Stahl, N. A., Simpson, M. L., & Hayes, C. G. (1992). Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk college students. Journal of Developmental Education, 16(1), 2-10.

Tucker, A. (2012). The history of the undergraduate program in mathematics in the United States. Retrieved from the Mathematical Association of America: http://www.maa.org/sitesdefault/files/pdf/CUPM/pdf/MAAUndergradHistory.pdf

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).